Talk:Executables
From Just Solve the File Format Problem
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What category would tokenized BASIC programs (as stored in various types of early personal computer) fit into? [[User:Dan Tobias|Dan Tobias]] ([[User talk:Dan Tobias|talk]]) 21:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | What category would tokenized BASIC programs (as stored in various types of early personal computer) fit into? [[User:Dan Tobias|Dan Tobias]] ([[User talk:Dan Tobias|talk]]) 21:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Perhaps a new category for source code. Or perhaps serialization. Or both. Nothing really stops a format from appearing in multiple categories. Todo for the future, I have an idea about assigning a format two categories, which might be called "usage type" and "data type". Usage type might be image format, audio format, or text document format (for example MS Word doc would end up here.) Data type would be stuff like XML based format, proprietary binary, plain text, etc. I need to polish that suggestion. Anyway, I recommend a new category for source code. [[User:Nitro2k01|Nitro2k01]] ([[User talk:Nitro2k01|talk]]) 21:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | :Perhaps a new category for source code. Or perhaps serialization. Or both. Nothing really stops a format from appearing in multiple categories. Todo for the future, I have an idea about assigning a format two categories, which might be called "usage type" and "data type". Usage type might be image format, audio format, or text document format (for example MS Word doc would end up here.) Data type would be stuff like XML based format, proprietary binary, plain text, etc. I need to polish that suggestion. Anyway, I recommend a new category for source code. [[User:Nitro2k01|Nitro2k01]] ([[User talk:Nitro2k01|talk]]) 21:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Specially-generated executables == | ||
| + | I want to make an index article for certain special executable quasi-formats. It would list (or point to) self-extracting archives/installers, executable compression (obfuscation, etc.), executable documents, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Question is, what do I name it? Is there a name for this concept? I might name it "Generated executables", but that seems imprecise. -[[User:Jsummers|Jsummers]] ([[User talk:Jsummers|talk]]) 16:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 16 October 2021
What category would tokenized BASIC programs (as stored in various types of early personal computer) fit into? Dan Tobias (talk) 21:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps a new category for source code. Or perhaps serialization. Or both. Nothing really stops a format from appearing in multiple categories. Todo for the future, I have an idea about assigning a format two categories, which might be called "usage type" and "data type". Usage type might be image format, audio format, or text document format (for example MS Word doc would end up here.) Data type would be stuff like XML based format, proprietary binary, plain text, etc. I need to polish that suggestion. Anyway, I recommend a new category for source code. Nitro2k01 (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Specially-generated executables
I want to make an index article for certain special executable quasi-formats. It would list (or point to) self-extracting archives/installers, executable compression (obfuscation, etc.), executable documents, etc.
Question is, what do I name it? Is there a name for this concept? I might name it "Generated executables", but that seems imprecise. -Jsummers (talk) 16:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
