Talk:Graphics
From Just Solve the File Format Problem
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Is this distinction (which I understand from a technical point of view, I should add) really relevant enough to warrant a separate category? Perhaps the solution is to rename the whole category to raster graphics formats? --[[User:Nitro2k01|Nitro2k01]] ([[User talk:Nitro2k01|talk]]) 12:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | :Is this distinction (which I understand from a technical point of view, I should add) really relevant enough to warrant a separate category? Perhaps the solution is to rename the whole category to raster graphics formats? --[[User:Nitro2k01|Nitro2k01]] ([[User talk:Nitro2k01|talk]]) 12:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'd support renaming category to Raster. [[User:swanQ|swanQ]] | ||
Revision as of 18:21, 12 November 2012
in this list (http://justsolve.archiveteam.org/index.php/Graphics) JPG is listed as a BMP format. I would argue its not a bit mapped image format. Raster yes, bmp no....
- Does 'Raster' need to be a separate category then? Dan Tobias (talk) 07:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Is this distinction (which I understand from a technical point of view, I should add) really relevant enough to warrant a separate category? Perhaps the solution is to rename the whole category to raster graphics formats? --Nitro2k01 (talk) 12:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'd support renaming category to Raster. swanQ
