Talk:Archiving
From Just Solve the File Format Problem
(Difference between revisions)
Jason Scott (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: The seed for this page came from a gigantic list; the categories represent only a few minutes of sortation effort. I am strongly in favor of using actual mediawiki categories. [[User:Chronomex|Chronomex]] ([[User talk:Chronomex|talk]]) 05:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | : The seed for this page came from a gigantic list; the categories represent only a few minutes of sortation effort. I am strongly in favor of using actual mediawiki categories. [[User:Chronomex|Chronomex]] ([[User talk:Chronomex|talk]]) 05:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I concur that there's a real benefit to begin making a Categories approach to these items, so that as we mess with the core ontology, the Categories will take over. There's some extensions to automatically make Category pages - I'll make sure that's in place and we'll have a category piece as well, which will make finding things easier. --[[User:Jason Scott|Jason Scott]] ([[User talk:Jason Scott|talk]]) 05:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:13, 1 November 2012
I was about to create a separate category for 'container' formats, but thought I would check here just in case someone had lumped them under compression. Which is what has happened. Having a 'non-compressed' category under the 'compression' category demonstrates the folly of this approach, I think!
I realise that zip and related formats conflate the two notions, but there are many, many container formats which aren't compressed. And there are some compression formats (LZW for example) that aren't container formats. I vote for splitting them but with appropriate cross-linking,
- The seed for this page came from a gigantic list; the categories represent only a few minutes of sortation effort. I am strongly in favor of using actual mediawiki categories. Chronomex (talk) 05:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- I concur that there's a real benefit to begin making a Categories approach to these items, so that as we mess with the core ontology, the Categories will take over. There's some extensions to automatically make Category pages - I'll make sure that's in place and we'll have a category piece as well, which will make finding things easier. --Jason Scott (talk) 05:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
