User talk:Halftheisland
From Just Solve the File Format Problem
(Difference between revisions)
Dan Tobias (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: I think trackers pose an interesting problem in the Music vs. Sound issue - they produce single, self-contained files which hold both the instructions for playback and (often) the samples / instruments. They aren't, as far as I'm aware, generally used to control a standalone instrument in the same sense as MIDI, although I believe some of the Adlib trackers work in a similar way, in that they pass instructions for playback to a specific brand or type of soundcard.[[User:Halftheisland|Halftheisland]] ([[User talk:Halftheisland|talk]]) 18:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | :: I think trackers pose an interesting problem in the Music vs. Sound issue - they produce single, self-contained files which hold both the instructions for playback and (often) the samples / instruments. They aren't, as far as I'm aware, generally used to control a standalone instrument in the same sense as MIDI, although I believe some of the Adlib trackers work in a similar way, in that they pass instructions for playback to a specific brand or type of soundcard.[[User:Halftheisland|Halftheisland]] ([[User talk:Halftheisland|talk]]) 18:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::: To try and get at this point in a way that allows us some preliminary organisation, I would suggest that anything which requires the emulation of a specific piece of hardware for playback (like, I believe, some of the Adlib trackers or the [[PSF]] variants) should be categorised under [[Music]]. Anything which can be played back by any player possessing the correct format info / codecs should go under [[Audio]]. Not sure if that's helpful. [[User:Halftheisland|Halftheisland]] ([[User talk:Halftheisland|talk]]) 18:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ::: To try and get at this point in a way that allows us some preliminary organisation, I would suggest that anything which requires the emulation of a specific piece of hardware for playback (like, I believe, some of the Adlib trackers or the [[PSF]] variants) should be categorised under [[Music]]. Anything which can be played back by any player possessing the correct format info / codecs should go under [[Audio]]. Not sure if that's helpful. [[User:Halftheisland|Halftheisland]] ([[User talk:Halftheisland|talk]]) 18:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::: Maybe the best bet would be to create a unified "Audio and Music" category, with subheaders (just like the Graphics category has subheaders for raster, vector, animation, etc.) like "Sound waves", "Musical instrument control", "Trackers", and "Musical Notation" (e.g., guitar tabs)? [[User:Dan Tobias|Dan Tobias]] ([[User talk:Dan Tobias|talk]]) 03:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:28, 16 November 2012
To try to get some order and logic to the Audio and Music file types, aren't "trackers" of the sort as some you've posted more in the area of instrument control than direct storage of audio (e.g., more like MIDI than WAV)... and thus, belonging in the Music rather than Audio section? Or does this ontology not make sense and need to be rethought? Dan Tobias (talk) 17:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- (Maybe Audio and Music should be merged, and then grouped into subcategories such as Musical Instrument Control and Sound Wave Storage?) Dan Tobias (talk) 17:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- I think trackers pose an interesting problem in the Music vs. Sound issue - they produce single, self-contained files which hold both the instructions for playback and (often) the samples / instruments. They aren't, as far as I'm aware, generally used to control a standalone instrument in the same sense as MIDI, although I believe some of the Adlib trackers work in a similar way, in that they pass instructions for playback to a specific brand or type of soundcard.Halftheisland (talk) 18:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- To try and get at this point in a way that allows us some preliminary organisation, I would suggest that anything which requires the emulation of a specific piece of hardware for playback (like, I believe, some of the Adlib trackers or the PSF variants) should be categorised under Music. Anything which can be played back by any player possessing the correct format info / codecs should go under Audio. Not sure if that's helpful. Halftheisland (talk) 18:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe the best bet would be to create a unified "Audio and Music" category, with subheaders (just like the Graphics category has subheaders for raster, vector, animation, etc.) like "Sound waves", "Musical instrument control", "Trackers", and "Musical Notation" (e.g., guitar tabs)? Dan Tobias (talk) 03:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- To try and get at this point in a way that allows us some preliminary organisation, I would suggest that anything which requires the emulation of a specific piece of hardware for playback (like, I believe, some of the Adlib trackers or the PSF variants) should be categorised under Music. Anything which can be played back by any player possessing the correct format info / codecs should go under Audio. Not sure if that's helpful. Halftheisland (talk) 18:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- I think trackers pose an interesting problem in the Music vs. Sound issue - they produce single, self-contained files which hold both the instructions for playback and (often) the samples / instruments. They aren't, as far as I'm aware, generally used to control a standalone instrument in the same sense as MIDI, although I believe some of the Adlib trackers work in a similar way, in that they pass instructions for playback to a specific brand or type of soundcard.Halftheisland (talk) 18:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
